|
Health Goals Health Article
|
| Table of Contents |
HEALTH GOALSHealth goals can provide direction to health policy, guide efforts to improve health, and help to evaluate progress. A goals process almost always leads to greater emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention. The idea of specifying health goals grew out of the management-byobjectives movement that developed after World War II and became part of the strategic planning movement in the 1960s and 1970s. Several related concepts are involved, although terminology varies from one setting to another. A "goal" is a statement of a desirable state of affairs, generally stated in fairly broad terms. An "objective" is a narrower, quantitative statement that sets out a target population, the intervention to be used, and the indicator to be measured. A "target" is a specific statement of the amount of improvement to be achieved and the date by which it is to be achieved. THE UNITED STATES EXPERIENCEIn the United States, the initiative for setting goals has been led by the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. It grew directly out of the management-by-objectives movement, and has, accordingly, emphasized measurement. In 1979, The 1990 Health Objectives for the Nation: A Midcourse Review presented progress to that date and predicted whether the objectives would be achieved. Progress for each measurable objective was presented graphically. At the end of the cycle, the results were summarized in Prevention Profile Health, United States, 1991 (the prevalence of smoking in 1990 was reported to be 25.5%). Overall, the goals for mortality reduction had been achieved for infants, children, and adults, but not for young people; 32 percent of the objectives had been attained, 34 percent showed progress, 11 percent were moving in the opposite direction, and 23 percent could not be evaluated because of lack of data. A new cycle began in 1991 with Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. While the first cycle emphasized mortality (except for elders) and was rather disease oriented, with little or no mention of inequalities in health, the goals in this cycle were broadened to include morbidity and quality of life, and a concern for reducing inequalities. The objectives for 2010 were released in January 2000. Throughout, the objectives have not been intended solely for use by government agencies, but throughout the U.S. health care system, and there has been considerable consultation with health care organizations. Government activities have been strongly influenced in terms of programming, methodological work, and publication of newsletters. THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCEThe European initiative grew out of the Health for All initiative of the World Health Organization (WHO). The European Office of WHO decided that health promotion was the approach most likely to achieve the goal of health for all people, and an Office of Health Promotion was established. In addition to stimulating a worldwide health-promotion movement, the office coordinated the 1985 publication of Targets for Health for All, which listed thirty-eight targets for the European region. From the beginning the movement was much influenced by social scientists, and emphasized social development. (The first target stated, "By the year 2000, the actual differences in health status between countries and between groups within countries should be reduced by at least 25 percent, by improving the health of disadvantaged nations and groups.") Countries were encouraged to develop their own strategic plans and goals, and most countries in the region have done so. The targets were revised in 1991, and a new set of twenty-one targets, Health 21—Health for All in the 21st Century, was released in 1998. There has been less emphasis on measurement and evaluation than in the United States, and more emphasis on motivation and leadership in health policy. |
advertisement |
|
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.